MOVIE offered in yr2004 NOTtaken by HuJu ..BAABUL?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

jasper om and sascha kirshna brothers

@JAMBO

Inactive

Posted: 16 years ago

#11

thank you for the article it is good to know about our kumkum star intentions and not letting us down.

Quote

Nazmien aka Naz

@NazNgs

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 16 years ago

#12

thanks yaara for the article....

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

surakshita

@surakshita

Sparkler

Posted: 16 years ago

#13

Juhi was perfectly right

she always has been exclusive and all her roles till now have been recognised by viewers and fans and critics alike

more like Kajol/Aamir Khan of the small telly who do unique and different roles but which is most talked of and appreciated by one and all.

HuJu were very much for MOVIES as far as yr 2000 from day one

they have made everyone situp and watch them

I would prefer if HuJu do movie roles which are author backed roles rather than prancing round the trees

waiting for his movie to be on the floors

the Movie and big producer could be B.R.Chopra's Baabul (Rani/Salman/John), which was delayed and released in end 2006

it was similiar or almost a rip-off to what HuJu did in Kumkum

Edited by surakshita - 16 years ago

Quote

Rahila

@Rah_HuJu

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 16 years ago

#14

I don't think so Su...Baabul had a very different concept from KK....in that the devar marries bhabhi track...but in Baabul, the father-in-law tries to get his daughter-in-law married again....

Quote

San

@sanw

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 16 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: Rah_HuJu
I don't think so Su...Baabul had a very different concept from KK....in that the devar marries bhabhi track...but in Baabul, the father-in-law tries to get his daughter-in-law married again....

I very much agree with you

As far as I remember the story of baabul, it is the Father-in-law who marries his daughter-in-law to her friend after the death of his son

the concept of 1st part of KK was entirely different

Quote

Ruhi gandhi

@Ruhihutijufan

Inactive

Posted: 16 years ago

#16

hi thanx for the article...hmm its good that they did not took kumkum...kumkum has to be unique that aisa koi serial ya phir movie dubara na ban paaye.....

Quote

Simran

@.x. Simran .x.

Inactive

+ 2

Posted: 16 years ago

#17

Thanks for this Article Surakshita 😳..

Quote

surakshita

@surakshita

Sparkler

Posted: 16 years ago

#18

Rahila and Sanwak

Kumkum main concept was widow re-marriage which was the concept of Baabul

in Kumkum it was her best friend who didnt turn up which had then her devar Sumit who married her

in Baabul it was her best friend to whom she was married

concept was the same, so i more or less think its Baabul

and somewhere i did read while surfing this article that Amitabh-Hema and Salman was signed and they had yet to sign one actor and one actress

Amitabh is an Epitome of acting histrioics so would love one day HuJu to share screen presence with Amitabh Bachchan

Originally posted by: sanwak

I very much agree with you

As far as I remember the story of baabul, it is the Father-in-law who marries his daughter-in-law to her friend after the death of his son

the concept of 1st part of KK was entirely different

Edited by surakshita - 16 years ago

Quote

norzar

@norzar

Trailblazer

+ 3

Posted: 16 years ago

#19

hi

babul may well be the film they were offered

maybe a few things were changed in the script her and there

but the theme was same

ie the story of a widow's re-marriage

norzar