Well, this is the most ridiculous argument, that the child would have inherited the genes of the father and not the mother (Sorry no offense but couldn't help it). Many of the children in orphanages could be the product of a rapist or such social offenders. Do you mean to say that it would be dangerous to adopt a child from these orphanages because this child could have inherited the violent genes from the unknown parent? While certain characteristics can be inherited, much of character development takes place in the environment the child is brought up. I think Geet and Maan will make lovely parents and whatever kinky gene the child could have inherited from the father could well be modified by the upbringing.
As to her youth, there are many young mothers, Geet is an adult, not a minor. Nothing stops her from pursuing her education/career or whatever if she so wants to even after the birth of the child because she would have a support system (what better support system than a rock solid man like Maan?) I know of girls whom I studied with, who had early marriages while still studying, had babies too and still went on to finish post graduation and even M.Phils.
Opti, it is a "hypothetical" argument that was offered be it ridiculous or whatever. A woman may chose to abort a child based on any "n" number of criteria. That "n" or "n+1" number of criteria are something that we all may or even some of us may not be purview to. So why make a judgment call on that!
As I clarified in my reply to Ayesha (Cool Dude) GEET's reasons may be innumerable, and not necessarily the ones noted down by me or provided as hypothesis by me.
Whatever be the reasons, as per law she still is within the time frame to go for an abortion if she so chooses.
The question is "DO WE THINK SHE STILL HAS A CHOICE EVEN NOW?" or NOT?
Thanks,
Bri