Chandra Nandini 10: The Mystery of the Missing Chemistry - Page 10

Originally posted by: sashashyam

Thanks, my dear, presuming that it is a compliment, but what is SOH?

Shyamala Aunty

Originally posted by: munni_rajatfan

well for me chemistry doesnt mean only when ur attracted or interested towards a girl or guy. chemistry is how easily u can depict a situation as an actor with the other gender. even disinterest can be a chemistry & yes they certainly has chemistry. & im not really a young girl drooling for love stories but i quite liked both the actors in tht scene. yes they didnt had much scenes right now & rightly so bcoz its focusing mainly on cgm's journey so for me its good enough.

Originally posted by: jayaks02

Rudaali means wailing - I hardly considered my comments to be wailing type . Anyways, it is one's perception.

If only a set of emotions are allowed in the thread, I was not aware of it.

I write what comes to my mind . If this is not allowed, will be staying out.

Originally posted by: durgeshnandini

Aunty,

Now this impeccable analogy to bubbling broths, colour changing reagents, the multiple ideas on the presence or absence of the important conditions of the reaction - the heat, temperature, catalyst, promoters and the state of the respective reagents, namely - really makes me sniff the air around the thread - and lo behold! It smells like a Chemistry Lab! 😉

You have long ago mastered the physics of how we know what is WORK - so you see there was some work done by the collective effort of guru and shishya, Chanakya provides the necessary force and Chandra makes it happen by putting in the much needed displacement - Takshashila to Pataliputra and back.

Now this is something else again, with all the physics lingo down pat - force, displacement - and that of chemistry too - reagents, catalysts et al!👏

Nandini, who is proud to have got half-a-very-very-genuinely-meant leg pull kinda compliment from you, in between the immense footage that RT gets 😉 - has demonstrated some INERTIA OF MOTION, by pulling the horse reins and promptly dismounting themselves from the ride. Chandragupta, has wasted no time in demonstrating how every action has an equal and opposite reaction - by transferring the best slap in the universe on his cheek to a lock jaw of her mandible 😉

OK, here we have reached biology, which is strange territory for me, being a maths person. Though the familiar references to Newton's Third Law , as also to the inertia of motion, were welcome!😉

The biological observations as noted by Lashy di and you in the form of edema stricken eyes of Nandni to every up and down of Chandra's furrowed brows, not to mention the antibacterial properties of his saliva in association with her pearly teeth! The murmuring Mura and the aggressive Avantika have hauled Nand over the coals, for he was hollow, and his BP must've been low!

Well, I do not know what his BP is normally, but the way he yells, it must have shot up past 120/80 in a jiffy!

But as we wrap up this prolonged experimental set up, we don't find any Hermione Granger stirring a cauldron full of Amortensia and no visible colour change has occurred in the still gurgling green potion - but Lashy di hopeful for she has analysed the episodes thoroughly - so she successfully defines the chemical nature of this complicated reaction and even suggests the possible flaws in the VFX apparatus!

Now this is the easiest way out. Blame the VFX for the persisting green!😆

Take care of your health and biweekly or weekly, your posts will be eagerly awaited! 😳

Originally posted by: sashashyam

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">What is this, my very dear Sri? You are sulking? This is not like you. You should fight the good fight and defend your positions like the tough cookie that I know you are. Plus you do not see a joke as a joke.

Instead, you are now indulging in emotional blackmail like my chipmunks. OK, OK, if my comments upset you, I am very sorry! Happy? Aur kya? Uthak baithak karoon kaan pakakde?

Anyway, what would be the point of this Akka, Akka relationship if it cannot take even a few comments from me without collapsing into misunderstanding and resentment? Not much, I am afraid. It is very disheartening and it saddens me.

Shyamala Akka


</font>

Originally posted by: jayaks02

Akka - It is not that - Nor is an apology required from your end.

Let me explain a bit, if it can help - There were some expectations from me on a certain level of treatment to the period's authenticity. So even after the JA experience it was still shocking and disappointing to see the shallow storyline development here. May be I was thinking sub-consciously that it will be like JA initial days in terms of story and character development.

What I expressed is my POV on all of these. It may have sounded off as wailing to anyone but I was not. I hope to be vindicated soon as TRP antics will demand few sillier things in future and story may be even more compromised. What will probably be left out is names like CGM and Chanakya; Any other resemblance to the original events will be purely incidental and unintentional. So I was just predicting this in lighter vein and not definitely wailing.

There is nothing wrong if the author chooses not to consider every commentary or inputs that is not to their taste or liking. It is perfectly understandable. But every viewer can ONLY comment based on their perceptions and imagination.

So this is all fair and I have no problem at all. I have definitely liked all the historical discussions here. Infact I went to other threads where you had given some good historical notes and references on Mauryan Empire. It was a fascinating read.

Originally posted by: sashashyam

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">What is this, my very dear Sri? You are sulking? This is not like you. You should fight the good fight and defend your positions like the tough cookie that I know you are. Plus you do not see a joke as a joke.

Instead, you are now indulging in emotional blackmail like my chipmunks. OK, OK, if my comments upset you, I am very sorry! Happy? Aur kya? Uthak baithak karoon kaan pakakde?

Anyway, what would be the point of this Akka, Akka relationship if it cannot take even a few comments from me without collapsing into misunderstanding and resentment? Not much, I am afraid. It is very disheartening and it saddens me.

Shyamala Akka


</font>

Originally posted by: ---Khushi---

Sri...I think what has actually upset you is my remark about Shyamala Aunty's humour...things were fine before that...

If my comment has indeed upset you, I'd like to apologise from the bottom of my heart. I consider you to be a very good friend of mine, & would never dream of mocking you, or your comments. I just found Shyamala Aunty's comment funny, n hence commented on it, all in good humour.

So please do forgive me dear friend, if I have unintentionally upset you.