🏏IPL 2026: GT vs SRH, 56th Match, at Ahmedabad
🏏IPL 2026: RCB vs KKR, 57th Match, at Raipur🏏
Alia Bhatt gets ignored by media at Cannes Red Carpet!
THARLA TAR MAG! Thread 10
Yeh rishta boring and bland kehlata hai
Pati Patni Aur Wo Do - Movie Reviews & BO Discussion
Maan Geet 3S : The Returning love[Part 2 on Pg 2]
Originally posted by: maheshbedant
Already they twisted the history so much but now they totally turned the history.
They could have showed some other reason..
But showing this reason is not acceptable
1.No King of kalinga was ever a thief
2. Never did kalinga attacked on any state let it to take revenge also..
3. It was magadh who attacked kalinga because kalinga was more economically stable than magadh bcz it is situated near the sea and it helped kalinga to increase its economy through trade ways..
Which magadh also wanted...
4. Ashok attacked kalinga because of his desire to conquest,territory expansion and economic benefits.
5. we had no king ever in our history whose name was jagannath.
6. Jagannath is our mahaprabhu or lord's name who is the last form of lord Vishnu.
7. And showing a king whose name is on our beloved lord and showing him as evil is a insult for us.
Originally posted by: staryypriya
+1...
totally agree with you...bdw r u from odisha????
Originally posted by: maheshbedant
Yaa, I am 😃