There is no debate.
Anyway you are getting personal now. Stop it.
🏏IPL 2026: GT vs SRH, 56th Match, at Ahmedabad
🏏IPL 2026: RCB vs KKR, 57th Match, at Raipur🏏
Mouni Roy s marriage in trouble?
Anupamaa 12 May 2026 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
THARLA TAR MAG! Thread 10
Alia Bhatt gets ignored by media at Cannes Red Carpet!
How did Sara Ali Khan have such a bad downfall? Feat Faridoon
There is no debate.
Anyway you are getting personal now. Stop it.
Women attack opinions of a man in groups. Men would usually not want to describe attributes about other men. Therefore correlating LOOKS with Box Office Returns is ethically more fitting for a debate HERE.
A debate can be arrived at from any suitable angle regarding that CORE TOPIC (Male Candy). We can choose BO over LOOKS anytime we want. That is a debate. 👍🏼
For example, Kartik would be a better Box office & Male candy prospect in Bollywood compared to Rampal.
Originally posted by: rckRadhe
A debate can be arrived at from any suitable angle regarding that CORE TOPIC (Male Candy). We canand choose BO over LOOKS anytime we want. That is a debate. 👍🏼
Why must anyone do that when there was an elaborate poll here just a while back about the hottest actress (young gen). Actresses were pitted against each other in terms of looks and not BO. If that was fair game, so is this. Moreover this topic is merely asking everyone to post whomever they find good looking/hot. Quit whining and stop trying to pick unnecessary fights.
This is exactly how directors & producers think, when using an Actor for male candy. We have to think OUTSIDE THE BOX.
Originally posted by: DetachednNumb
Why must anyone do that when there was an elaborate poll here just a while back about the hottest actress (young gen). Actresses were pitted against in terms of looks and not BO. If that was fair game, so is this. Moreover this topic is merely asking everyone to post whomever they find good looking/hit. Quit whining and trying to pick unnecessary fights.
A slight technicality that may have been overlooked on your part. A voting survey, is not an open debate.
Originally posted by: rckRadhe
A slight technicality that may have been overlooked on your part. A voting survey, is not an open debate.
Flawed observation but whatever. This is not a debate. The TM asked for members to take names or post pics of good looking actors not for their reasoning or to debate.
Originally posted by: DetachednNumb
Flawed observation but whatever. This is not a debate. The TM asked for members to take names or post pics of good looking actors not for their reasoning or to debate.
'Flawed' as defined by you. We look at the pic, and then determine freely as to if it could be defined as candy. Isn't It?
Originally posted by: rckRadhe
This is exactly how directors & producers think, when using an Actor for male candy. We have to think OUTSIDE THE BOX.
Are you trolling with your replies because I am dying 😭
https://x.com/i/status/2039673689281864066
Okay, real talk: is Agastya Nanda officially the new “Oh wait… why is my screen suddenly hotter?” moment of Bollywood? Because the way this boy...
https://x.com/iewangoalskiiii/status/2035750618812563592 https://x.com/93KIWIXCALAMITY/status/2035964182483607624...
https://youtu.be/IXaPpDYgwYg?si=nCUE0VAJ5adtYPiM https://youtu.be/FudfVyYWNxQ?si=LtBcYnpVsoKDafd1
He is ugly and pretty average from all standards. Doesn’t look like a Bollywood hero material at all. I’m pretty sure he will flop within 2...
0