Kangana Ranaut: I was physically abused by Aditya Pancholi, had seeked

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Sri D

@SriRani

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#61

Originally posted by: maha15
16-17 yr old girl staying with Married Man...🤢...

When I was 14 there werecouple of men tried to groom me...I flew away from the scene like a frightened deer when I understood the intention. At that age I don't even have idea what sex is but something was uncomfortable enough that brain sent Run alert.😆

Quote

Sri D

@SriRani

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#62

When with pancholi she seeked Zaria help, when with hrithik she spilled the news to papa Roshan. Is it some blackmail ?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Rohit

@Anachronist

Trailblazer

Posted: 8 years ago

#63

ghanta you were abused , main kyun maanu teri baat , kyun nahi police complaint karke saja dilwayi , you the bastion of feminism (or should I say fake feminism

Quote

maha15

@maha15

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#64

Originally posted by: Sri-R

When I was 14 there werecouple of men tried to groom me...I flew away from the scene like a frightened deer when I understood the intention. At that age I don't even have idea what sex is but something was uncomfortable enough that brain sent Run alert.😆

I know Its scary...98% Girls are like that.

Edited by maha15 - 8 years ago

Quote

Illyrion

@Illyrion

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#65

Originally posted by: -smolderhalder.
After seeing her real DOP I realized that she wasn't a minor when she met Aditya.
In June 2004 she was already 18 years old which makes her an adult in most countries. So why in all of her interviews she says she was a minor when she first met him?

^In no way I'm trying to justify how that asshole Aditya Pancholi treated her but it did make me curious about why she says she was a minor when she met him when in reality she wasn't.

I'm not sure if this is rhetorical? Claiming she was a minor makes her look less responsible/guilty and him a bigger jerk/pedophile. It's always about how to spin the story in her favor... She is a pathological liar.

Quote

Remus.Lupin4

@Remus.Lupin4

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#66

Originally posted by: -smolderhalder.
After seeing her real DOP I realized that she wasn't a minor when she met Aditya.
In June 2004 she was already 18 years old which makes her an adult in most countries. So why in all of her interviews she says she was a minor when she first met him?

^In no way I'm trying to justify how that asshole Aditya Pancholi treated her but it did make me curious about why she says she was a minor when she met him when in reality she wasn't.

she brought the case with Malayalam actress to make it seem how fearful she was...

when asked about asperger's syndrome she was outraged on behalf of people who might have it...

i totally bought into feminism of hers but i doubt she supports charities and NGOs that support single mother's or victims of domestic abuse...

biggest thing i doubt is hrithik writing email abusing other actresses and calling them names... sadly in our society its mostly women who tear down other women

Quote

Kara

@Kara_R

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

#67

^^^^^ her brand of fake feminism is self serving and dangerous. Feminism is a hard enough concept for some to grasp, here she comes to muddy it and for what?!?!

Quote

IPSO_FACTO

@IPSO_FACTO

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#68

Even if she was a minor, it doesnt matter because Pancholi could have a sexual relation with her with no legal consequences. She was seventeen, as she claims, so sexual rekatioms with anyone above 16 years then was legal.
And, why she keeps saying she was a minor? How does that change the scenario? He did not gag you to be with him. If he assaulted you, then go to the frgging police station. When Shiney's maid can accuse him of rape then you should also have the guts to voice your opinions.
Abhi toh badi badass banti ho, tab kya hua tha.

Edited by Xx..Anjali..xX - 8 years ago

Quote

Rohit

@Anachronist

Trailblazer

Posted: 8 years ago

#69

Originally posted by: Xx..Anjali..xX
Even if she was a minor, it doesnt matter because Pancholi could have a sexual relation with her with no legal consequences. She was seventeen, as she claims, so sexual rekatioms with anyone above 16 years then was legal.
And, why she keeps saying she was a minor? How does that change the scenario? He did not gag you to be with him. If he assaulted you, then go to the frgging police station. When Shiney's maid can accuse him of rape then you should also have the guts to voice your opinions.
Abhi toh badi badass banti ho, tab kya hua tha.

she is biggest feku and hypocrite , will go to any lengths to get sympathy if it helps that some people go to watch simran. I supported her earlier but her sudden silence and now sudden sprout of allegations have made it clear as to what is the truth

Quote

Minimumish

@DobbyDeol

Stunner

+ 8

Posted: 8 years ago

#70

Originally posted by: Xx..Anjali..xX
Even if she was a minor, it doesnt matter because Pancholi could have a sexual relation with her with no legal consequences. She was seventeen, as she claims, so sexual rekatioms with anyone above 16 years then was legal.
And, why she keeps saying she was a minor? How does that change the scenario? He did not gag you to be with him. If he assaulted you, then go to the frgging police station. When Shiney's maid can accuse him of rape then you should also have the guts to voice your opinions.
Abhi toh badi badass banti ho, tab kya hua tha.

Tab koi movie nahi thi na promote karne ke liye..😆