why khilji in padmavati

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

zara321

@zara321

Stunner

+ 7

Posted: 8 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: Luna46

Five out of eight SLB movies are love stories, and all his movies made in large scale and grandeur are of romance genre.
Also RS can accept a short role in an SLB movie since the director has given him two big Hits in his kitty.
I really don't get this. When the actor who has himself acted in the movie, is saying that he has a big role, then what's the big deal?? How can we say that he's lying when we haven't even watched the movie. 😆

all three hav significant roles, no one has talked about who has the bigger or smaller role, plus rs accepted playing khilji during the post production of BM, if ratan was the bigger role rs wud hav accepted that, but he didn't, he wanted to play khilji coz obviously its a gud role, and its not short, like i said rs has been filming since november last year and is still filming even now, he started filming a month before dp and shahid

Edited by zara321 - 8 years ago

Quote

486792

Hibernated

Posted: 8 years ago

#12

First of all,Khilji is an integral character in Ratan and Padmavati's life.He attacked Chittor and the Rajputs bravely defended it.Ratan and Padmavati gave up their lives instead of surrendering.And that's a historical fact.It cannot be changed.

Secondly why is Padmavati being viewed as a love story? It's the story of a courageous woman who fought for her honour.Ratan Singh was her husband and love of her life.Khilji was the despotic Sultan who was obsessed with her.Both the love story and Khilji's story are integral parts of the main plot.The movie cannot be based on a single plot alone.Neither can they show 2 hours full of Khilji nor 2 hours of Ratan-Padma's love story.It has to be a blend of everything.

Third,regarding Ranveer's choice to play Khilji,I am proud that he chose this dark and multifaceted character.This gave him a chance to explore and experiment himself as an actor and also the audience will get to see him in a completely different avatar.I am damn sure that Ranveer will excel as Khilji.Actors cannot play the same type of characters forever.They need to venture out of their comfort zone and take certain risks.Ranveer had the guts to do that.And he also has the talent to do complete justice to the character.

Fourth,Shahid's character is important too.For Padmavati was incomplete without Ratan.Shahid and Deepika's pairing is something new and I am looking forward to see their chemistry.

Therefore it's baseless to discuss who is more important between Khilji and Ratan.Historically both of them had their own significance.As far as the movie is concerned then it's not even released yet.How can anyone predict beforehand that Ratan will have more screenspace or Khilji will have less screenspace?😆Even the trailer is not released.Both the characters are important in their own way.

Edited by --BlackSheep-- - 8 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

maal_u_have

@maal_u_have

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#13

Which Shahid interview are you referring to, that you made SEVEN topics on?

Quote

zara321

@zara321

Stunner

+ 7

Posted: 8 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: --BlackSheep--
First of all,Khilji is an integral character in Ratan and Padmavati's life.He attacked Chittor and the Rajputs bravely defended it.Ratan and Padmavati gave up their lives instead of surrendering.And that's a historical fact.It cannot be changed.

Secondly why is Padmavati being viewed as a love story? It's the story of a courageous woman who fought for her honour.Ratan Singh was her husband and love of her life.Khilji was the despotic Sultan who was obsessed with her.Both the love story and Khilji's story are integral parts of the main plot.The movie cannot be based on a single plot alone.Neither can they show 2 hours full of Khilji nor 2 hours of Ratan-Padma's love story.It has to be a blend of everything.

Third,regarding Ranveer's choice to play Khilji,I am proud that he chose this dark and multifaceted character.This gave him a chance to explore and experiment himself as an actor and also the audience will get to see him in a completely different avatar.I am damn sure that Ranveer will excel as Khilji.Actors cannot play the same type of characters forever.They need to venture out of their comfort zone and take certain risks.Ranveer had the guts to do that.And he also has the talent to do complete justice to the character.

Fourth,Shahid's character is important too.For Padmavati was incomplete without Ratan.Shahid and Deepika's pairing is something new and I am looking forward to see their chemistry.

Therefore it's baseless to discuss who is more important between Khilji and Ratan.Historically both of them had their own significance.As far as the movie is concerned then it's not even released yet.How can anyone predict beforehand that Ratan will have more screenspace or Khilji will have less screenspace?😆Even the trailer is not released.Both the characters are important in their own way.

exactly, both khilji and ratan r important t the story-line, there wud be no story without them, and ranveer has already played a historic hero as Bajirao, if he played ratan it wud be repetitive, so i'm proud of him that he is changing things up and not playing the heroic warrior hero again, its a completely different charcater, a dark, evil, obsessive role, something we dont get to see so often from a leading actor, its will be exciting to see him in this role

Quote

Pehchaan.Kaun

@Pehchaan.Kaun

Sparkler

Posted: 8 years ago

#15

If Padmavati bombs, how many of here are ready to spare RS from the blame game and would consider Shahid Kapoor having main role in that ? 😆 This is the actual deciding factor about who plays what part. 😉

Quote

Jahanaroosa

@Jahanaroosa

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

#16

I am just saying this is ranveers insulte. How shahid calling movie e about how this is good intense love story ang rajput etc where ranveer taking his name in intv shahid sidelining rs and behaving his movie ranveer not matter

Quote

2filmy

@2filmy

Trailblazer

Posted: 8 years ago

#17

Ratan Singh was a Rajput
Padmavati was married to a Rajput family
Khilji lusted after a Rajput woman
Later tried to take over a Rajput Kingdom
The story is also set there

Quote

Justmoi

@Justmoi

Rocker

Posted: 8 years ago

#18

But I thought this was the story. 🤔

Edited by Justmoi - 8 years ago

Quote

blue-ice.

@blue-ice.

Achiever

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#19

Hain??? If not Khilji...then what else is there in the story of Padmavati?? Khilji and his lust for Padma is the highlight of the story...the love of Ratan Singh and Padma was what every married couple has...its not like Heer Ranjha or Sohini Mahiwal...so what did u expect...Padmavati will be all about the menacing, lustful and immoral Khilji who was eyeing a married woman.

Quote

Sree

@Katyayani_devi

Trailblazer

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#20

wats d plot slb? is dis slb trustable? is he making typical,hadnahi,kuch bhi bolly bakwas,garbage lust oops love story r showing reality.

who funds bolly? y dis bolly ppl glorify terrorism? n y they are making terrorism on hindu/Sikh women as a movie? don't dis bolly ppl ve guts to show how terrorism killed n converted millions of hindus of akhand bharath(india+pak+bangladesh+kashmir) for 800 years? entire Bollywood is bunch of useless 🤬

Edited by Eternal_Way - 8 years ago